作文首页初中作文寒假作文写人作文写景作文英语作文想象作文抒情作文议论文说明文单元作文科幻作文诗歌词赋写作素材 小学作文高中作文暑假作文写事作文写物作文节日作文话题作文描写作文记述文应用文毕业作文散文随笔日记游记写作指导 |
for the last 82years, sweden's nobel academy has decided who will receive the nobel prize in literature, thereby determining who will be elevated from the great and the near great to the immortal. but today the academy is coming under heavy criticism both from the without and from within.
critics contend that the selection of the winners often has less to do with true writing ability than with the peculiar internal politics of the academy and of sweden itself. according to ingmar bjorksten , the cultural editor for one of the country's two major newspapers, the prize continues to represent "what people call a very swedish exercise: reflecting swedish tastes."
the academy has defended itself against such charges of provincialism in its selection by asserting that its physical distance from the great literary capitals of the world actually serves to protect the academy from outside influences. this may well be true, but critics respond that this very distance may also be responsible for the academy's inability to perceive accurately authentic trends in the literary world.
regardless of concerns over the selection process, however, it seems that the prize will continue to survive both as an indicator of the literature that we most highly praise, and as an elusive goal that writers seek. if for no other reason, the prize will continue to be desirable for the financial rewards that accompany it; not only is the cash prize itself considerable, but it also dramatically increases sales of an author's books.